Explain the process of carbon 14 radioactive dating

Rated 4.28/5 based on 511 customer reviews

About 1.1% of all carbon is Carbon-13, with one extra neutron.But there is another form of carbon that, while not at all abundant, is definitely worth talking about.But the only evidence they have provided for such contamination is by appealing to how this data does not fit their paradigm of “millions of years”.And if the method is this prone to contamination, then it is hardly as trustworthy as claimed, so is an even weaker argument against the dates in the true record of Scripture.Since the global flood would have buried huge numbers of carbon-containing living things (which formed much of today’s coal, oil, natural gas and fossil containing limestone), we would expect the ratio of C in samples that are supposed to be millions of years old would be extremely problematic for uniformitarians.Contrary to the idea that radiocarbon poses “significant problems for the young earth position”, CMI has actually devoted an entire chapter in C was detected in them indicating that these coal sample are not millions of years old.

Most of the carbon in our world comes from long-dead stars, in the form of Carbon-12: carbon atoms containing six neutrons in their nucleus.From across the galaxy and across the Universe, from stars (including our Sun), pulsars, black holes and more, space is flooded with high-energy particles known as cosmic rays.Most frequently, cosmic rays are protons, but a handful are heavier ions and a few are even humble electrons.This is highly problematic for evolutionists and those who want to teach that the Earth is millions of years old.In an attempt to defend the paradigm of millions of years, some propose that the coal samples could have been contaminated by migration of Carbon14 from the atmosphere to the Coal Seam, double capture of thermal neutrons produced by fission of uranium in the surrounding rock, or by contamination with modern carbon during the testing process.

Leave a Reply